Scanning your connection...
Back to Glossary
Encryption

What is Encryption Ban?

Government efforts to outlaw, weaken, or mandate backdoors in end-to-end encryption — arguing that law enforcement needs access to encrypted communications, while security experts warn that any backdoor weakens security for everyone.

Also known as: Encryption Backdoor Mandate, Anti-Encryption Law, Crypto Wars, Going Dark Problem

The "crypto wars" have been raging since the 1990s — governments want to be able to read encrypted messages, while mathematicians and security experts keep explaining why that's technically impossible without making everyone less safe.

The Debate

Government Position ("Going Dark")

  • Criminals and terrorists use encryption to communicate beyond law enforcement's reach
  • Traditional wiretap capabilities don't work on encrypted messaging
  • Law enforcement needs "lawful access" to encrypted content
  • Solutions: mandatory backdoors, client-side scanning, or key escrow

Security Expert Position ("Going Bright")

  • Backdoors cannot be limited to "good guys" — any weakness will be exploited by criminals and hostile governments
  • Law enforcement has more data than ever (metadata, location, cloud backups, device seizure)
  • Weakening encryption endangers national security — military, intelligence, and critical infrastructure depend on strong encryption
  • No technical solution exists that provides access to one party without creating vulnerability for all

Global Encryption Threats

United States

  • EARN IT Act — Would hold platforms liable for user content, effectively pressuring them to abandon encryption
  • LAED Act (proposed) — Would require companies to comply with court orders to decrypt
  • FBI and DOJ have repeatedly called for encryption backdoors

United Kingdom

  • Online Safety Act (2023) — Includes powers to require platforms to scan encrypted messages for illegal content
  • Signal and WhatsApp have threatened to leave the UK rather than weaken encryption
  • Technical notices can compel companies to build surveillance capabilities

European Union

  • "Chat control" proposal — Would require scanning of all messages (including encrypted ones) for child sexual abuse material
  • Intense debate between privacy advocates and law enforcement
  • Multiple iterations voted down, keep returning

Australia

  • Assistance and Access Act (2018) — Can compel companies to create "capabilities" to circumvent encryption
  • Broadly criticized by tech industry
  • Signal has stated it would rather stop operating in Australia than comply

The Mathematical Reality

As security experts explain: You cannot create a backdoor that only works for authorized parties. Encryption is math. Either the encryption is strong (and no one can break it, including law enforcement), or it's weak (and everyone can break it, including criminals, foreign governments, and hackers).

What's at Stake

If encryption is weakened:

  • Banking becomes vulnerable — online transactions depend on encryption
  • Medical records are exposed — healthcare privacy requires encryption
  • National security is compromised — government communications use the same encryption standards
  • Journalists' sources are endangered
  • Dissidents in authoritarian countries lose their primary protection
  • Business communications become accessible to corporate espionage

Related Terms

Have more questions?

Use our guided flow to get the right next privacy step for Encryption Ban.

Open Guided Flow